Good morning! I know it's very early, but I feel like this is a topic that I had to touch on. I've read so much about it in the past 24 hours and I can not visually see why people keep comparing these two things like they are the only two crimes that exist. I'm not sure how that would affect the world, but I can only imagine.
The topic of whether models should be models or not because of their choice to be accompanied by an escort always seem to spark a rival of traumatic emotions and begins a never ending battle between models and photographers. But lately, I've seen an extra spice included that seems to have no relevance (to me). Every argument seems to bring up: Why would you want an escort when statistics prove that more women are killed by boyfriends/husbands than a photographer?
Okay. Now I haven't done much of a search on comparing those topics (which I need to do) but are there seriously statistics based on those contrasting issues?
Most women think that they will not become victims of their significant other.
Most women would prefer not to be be victimized by a photographer.
Most photographers don't anticipate being victims of models.
Okay. Now that we know that information are we safer without an escort? No. There's no proof of that. That is a personal choice for whatever reason. Therefore, whether women are murdered more by tigers or snakes, how is that suppose to convince a model that she should travel into a jungle of diverse gorillas alone and assume that she's safer because her pet snake and feline were left home?
The two doesn't match! That's all I'm saying. I'm not on anyone's side about the escort issue. I just wanted to know how others feel about the comparison. Respectful thoughts, comments, and opinions are accepted.
Supermodel Dominique
No comments:
Post a Comment